Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38555320›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2024

The SAGES MASTERS program bariatric surgery pathway selects 10 seminal publications on revisional bariatrics.

Thomas H Shin, Jerry Dang, Melanie Howell, Farah A Husain, Omar M Ghanem, James GBittner, Shaina R Eckhouse, Nicole Fearing, Enrique Elli, Mustafa Hussain and 7 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Thomas H ShinDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. thshin@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-270X
Jerry DangDigestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Melanie HowellDepartment of Surgery, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USA.
Farah A HusainDepartment of Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Omar M GhanemDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
James GBittnerDepartment of Surgery, St. Francis Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Shaina R EckhouseDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Nicole FearingDepartment of Surgery, HCA Midwest Health, Overland Park, KS, USA.
Enrique ElliDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mustafa HussainDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carlos GalvaniDepartment of Surgery, University of Arizona Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Shaneeta JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bipan ChandDepartment of Surgery, Ascension Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yagnik PandyaDepartment of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann M RogersDepartment of Surgery, Penn State, Hershey, PA, USA.
Matthew KrohDigestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marina KurianDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program designated bariatric surgery as a clinical pathway. Among the tiers of the Masters Program, revisional bariatric surgery is the highest tier of "mastery" within the pathway. This article presents the top 10 seminal studies representing the current landscape of revisional bariatrics.

methodsThe literature was systematically searched and seminal articles designated by consensus agreement of the SAGES Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery committee using multiple criteria, including impact on the field, citation frequency, and expert opinion. Articles were reviewed by committee members and presented in summarized fashion.

resultsThe top 10 papers are presented in grouped thematic categories covering the early evolution of revisional bariatrics, changing criteria for reoperative bariatric surgery, divergence of revision versus conversion bariatric surgery, and recent technologic innovations in revisional bariatric surgery. Each summary is presented with expert appraisal and commentary.

conclusionThese seminal papers represent a snapshot of the dynamic field of revisional bariatric surgery and emphasize the need to not only remain current with contemporary trends but also keep a patient-oriented perspective on patient and intervention selection for optimal success.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryReoperationCritical PathwaysHumansObesity, MorbidConversion bariatric surgeryRevisional bariatricsSAGES masters program

Identifiers

PMID38555320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.