Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38555281›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Flexible large-area ultrasound arrays for medical applications made using embossed polymer structures.

Paul L M J van Neer, Laurens C J M Peters, Roy G F A Verbeek, Bart Peeters, Gerard de Haas, Lars Hörchens, Laurent Fillinger, Thijs Schrama, Egon J W Merks-Swolfs, Kaj Gijsbertse and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
26.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Conformable CMOS Ultrasound System for Point-of-Care Imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent advances in transducers for through-tissue ultrasonic power transfer.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul L M J van Neer *Acoustics & Underwater Warfare, TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Laurens C J M Peters *Holst Centre, TNO, High Tech Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Roy G F A VerbeekHolst Centre, TNO, High Tech Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Bart PeetersHolst Centre, TNO, High Tech Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Gerard de HaasHolst Centre, TNO, High Tech Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Lars HörchensAcoustics & Underwater Warfare, TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0800-6163
Laurent FillingerAcoustics & Underwater Warfare, TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5575-6815
Thijs SchramaAcoustics & Underwater Warfare, TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Egon J W Merks-SwolfsAcoustics & Underwater Warfare, TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Kaj GijsbertseHuman Performance, TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
Anne E C M SarisMedical Ultrasound Imaging Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Moein MozaffarzadehMedical Ultrasound Imaging Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan M MenssenMedical Ultrasound Imaging Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Chris L de KorteMedical Ultrasound Imaging Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1987-6948
Jan-Laurens P J van der SteenHolst Centre, TNO, High Tech Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Arno W F VolkerAcoustics & Underwater Warfare, TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Gerwin H GelinckHolst Centre, TNO, High Tech Campus 31, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. gerwin.gelinck@tno.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3150-0211
Holst Centre (Netherlands) · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the huge progress in micro-electronics and artificial intelligence, the ultrasound probe has become the bottleneck in further adoption of ultrasound beyond the clinical setting (e.g. home and monitoring applications). Today, ultrasound transducers have a small aperture, are bulky, contain lead and are expensive to fabricate. Furthermore, they are rigid, which limits their integration into flexible skin patches. New ways to fabricate flexible ultrasound patches have therefore attracted much attention recently. First prototypes typically use the same lead-containing piezo-electric materials, and are made using micro-assembly of rigid active components on plastic or rubber-like substrates. We present an ultrasound transducer-on-foil technology based on thermal embossing of a piezoelectric polymer. High-quality two-dimensional ultrasound images of a tissue mimicking phantom are obtained. Mechanical flexibility and effective area scalability of the transducer are demonstrated by functional integration into an endoscope probe with a small radius of 3 mm and a large area (91.2×14 mm

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectronicsElectricityEquipment DesignPhantoms, ImagingTransducersUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38555281
PMCPMC10981753
OpenAlexW4393337759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.