ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
Impact of lymph node dissection on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global trends in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was performed to clarify the therapeutic and diagnostic roles of lymph node dissection (LND) by examining the impact of LND and lymph node yield (LNY) on oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Between 2014 and 2021, 216 patients underwent LND during RARC at Tokushima University Hospital and affiliated hospitals. Among the 216 patients, we compared 115 patients with an LNY of ≥ 20 and 101 with an LNY of < 20 to investigate the impact of LNY on surgical and oncological outcomes. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of LNY and the extent of LND on oncological outcomes by dividing the extent of LND into two groups (standard and extended). The 3-year rates of overall survival (OS) (p = 0.256), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.791), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.953) did not differ between the two groups divided by the LNY. A higher LNY was associated with a significantly higher lymph node positivity rate (p = 0.020). The incidence of LND-related major complications was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.910). The 3-year survival rates did not differ between the two groups divided by the extent of LND: OS (p = 0.366), CSS (p = 0.814), and RFS (p = 0.689). The LNY and extent of LND were not associated with oncological outcomes in patients undergoing LND during RARC, whereas a higher LNY was associated with lymph node positivity. In the era of adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, LND during RARC has an important diagnostic role in the detection of pathological node positivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.