Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38554192›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2024

The deconstructed procedural description in robotic colorectal surgery.

Kirsten Larkins, Ned Quirke, Hwa Ian Ong, Jade El Mohamed, Alexander Heriot, Satish Warrier, Helen Mohan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kirsten LarkinsDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ned QuirkeUniversity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Hwa Ian OngDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. hwaia3@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-9863
Jade El MohamedInternational Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexander HeriotDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Satish WarrierDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Helen MohanDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing robotic surgical utilisation in colorectal surgery internationally has strengthened the need for standardised training. Deconstructed procedural descriptions identify components of an operation that can be integrated into proficiency-based progression training. This approach allows both access to skill level appropriate training opportunities and objective and comparable assessment. Robotic colorectal surgery has graded difficulty of operative procedures lending itself ideally to component training. Developing deconstructed procedural descriptions may assist in the structure and progression components in robotic colorectal surgical training. There is no currently published guide to procedural descriptions in robotic colorectal surgical or assessment of their training utility. This scoping review was conducted in June 2022 following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to identify which robotic colorectal surgical procedures have available component-based procedural descriptions. Secondary aims were identifying the method of development of these descriptions and how they have been adapted in a training context. 20 published procedural descriptions were identified covering 8 robotic colorectal surgical procedures with anterior resection the most frequently described procedure. Five publications included descriptions of how the procedural description has been utilised for education and training. From these publications terminology relating to using deconstructed procedural descriptions in robotic colorectal surgical training is proposed. Development of deconstructed robotic colorectal procedural descriptions (DPDs) in an international context may assist in the development of a global curriculum of component operating competencies supported by objective metrics. This will allow for standardisation of robotic colorectal surgical training and supports a proficiency-based training approach.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansColorectal surgeryCurriculum designRobotic surgeryRobotic surgical trainingSurgical education

Identifiers

PMID38554192
PMCPMC10981632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.