Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38554168›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2024

MLASM: Machine learning based prediction of anticancer small molecules.

Priya Dharshini Balaji, Subathra Selvam, Honglae Sohn, Thirumurthy Madhavan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Priya Dharshini BalajiComputational Biology Laboratory, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Bio-Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.
Subathra SelvamComputational Biology Laboratory, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Bio-Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.
Honglae SohnDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Carbon Materials, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea.
Thirumurthy MadhavanComputational Biology Laboratory, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Bio-Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India. thiru.murthyunom@gmail.com.
SRM Institute of Science and Technology · INChosun University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer, being the second leading cause of death globally. So, the development of effective anticancer treatments is crucial in the field of medicine. Anticancer peptides (ACPs) have shown promising therapeutic potential in cancer treatment compared to traditional methods. However, the process of identifying ACPs through experimental means is often time-intensive and expensive. To overcome this issue, we employed a machine learning-based approach for the first time to develop an anticancer model using small molecules. Anticancer small molecules (ACSMs) are compounds that have been developed to target and inhibit cancer cells. In this study, we used 10,000 compounds to develop the machine learning models using five algorithms such as, Random Forest (RF), Light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Decision tree (DT) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The developed models were evaluated using the test set and top three models were identified (RF, LightGBM and XGB). Furthermore, to validate the predictive performance of our models, we have performed external validation using an FDA approved anticancer compounds/drugs. Following this analysis, we found that our LightGBM model correctly predicted 9 compounds as active. However, RF and XGB exhibited some limitations by predicting 8 and 7 compounds as active out of 10, respectively. These results demonstrate that, when compared to RF and XGB, the LightGBM model showcase robust prediction capabilities, achieving a superior accuracy of 79% with an AUC of 0.88. These findings provide promising insights into the potential of our approach for predicting anticancer small molecules, highlighting the role of machine learning in advancing cancer treatment research.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsMachine LearningDrug DiscoveryHumansNeoplasmsSmall Molecule LibrariesAntineoplastic AgentsSmall Molecule LibrariesAnticancer peptidesAnticancer small moleculesLight gradient boosting machine. Random forestMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38554168
OpenAlexW4393345740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.