Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38554146›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

Grasping tiny objects.

Martin Giesel, Federico De Filippi, Constanze Hesse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The "What" and "How" of Pantomime Actions.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin GieselSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, William Guild Building, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK. martin@martingiesel.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-7442
Federico De FilippiSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, William Guild Building, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-3611
Constanze HesseSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, William Guild Building, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-0781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In grasping studies, maximum grip aperture (MGA) is commonly used as an indicator of the object size representation within the visuomotor system. However, a number of additional factors, such as movement safety, comfort, and efficiency, might affect the scaling of MGA with object size and potentially mask perceptual effects on actions. While unimanual grasping has been investigated for a wide range of object sizes, so far very small objects (<5 mm) have not been included. Investigating grasping of these tiny objects is particularly interesting because it allows us to evaluate the three most prominent explanatory accounts of grasping (the perception-action model, the digits-in-space hypothesis, and the biomechanical account) by comparing the predictions that they make for these small objects. In the first experiment, participants (

Indexed as

Hand StrengthPsychomotor PerformanceSize PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38554146
PMCPMC11281983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.