ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Erdheim-Chester Disease Occult on Radiographs and CT but Visible on MRI and PET.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare neoplasm of histiocytes that is characterized by prominent involvement of the long bones. Approximately 1500 cases have been reported since the disease was first described in 1930. The imaging appearance of ECD can be highly variable given the numerous systems it can affect. In this case report we discuss a patient whose ECD was occult on multiple imaging modalities. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 60-year-old woman who presented with sub-acute left knee and calf pain that led to an MRI. She was found to have innumerable marrow-replacing lesions in the axial and appendicular skeleton visualized on the initial MRI, as well as on an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan. The patient did not have extraosseous abnormal uptake on the PET/CT. Subsequently, a lesion from the left iliac bone was histologically confirmed as ECD on the basis of positive staining for CD68 and CD163 and negative staining for CD1a. Osseous lesions in ECD have a distinct imaging appearance and are typically detected by radiography and bone scintigraphy, among other modalities; however, the lesions in this case were unexpectedly absent from those studies. CONCLUSIONS If there is a high degree of suspicion for ECD, 18F-FDG PET/CT and/or MRI may be necessary for adequate visualization of bone lesions, given that those lesions can have an infiltrative nature that may be difficult to image with other anatomic imaging modalities. Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT and/or MRI may also lead to adequate guidance of confirmatory biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.