Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38553748›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2024

VISTA drives macrophages towards a pro-tumoral phenotype that promotes cancer cell phagocytosis yet down-regulates T cell responses.

Yusheng Lin, Ghizlane Choukrani, Lena Dubbel, Lena Rockstein, Jimena Alvarez Freile, Yuzhu Qi, Valerie Wiersma, Hao Zhang, Karl-Wilhelm Koch, Emanuele Ammatuna and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. How lactate affects immune strategies in lymphoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yusheng Lin *Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Ghizlane Choukrani *Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Lena DubbelFaculty VI, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department for human Medicine, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, University Clinic for Gynecology, Oldenburg, Germany.
Lena RocksteinFaculty VI, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department for human Medicine, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, University Clinic for Gynecology, Oldenburg, Germany.
Jimena Alvarez FreileDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Yuzhu QiDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Valerie WiersmaDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Hao ZhangInstitute of Precision Cancer Medicine and Pathology, Jinan University Medical College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Karl-Wilhelm KochFaculty VI, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dept. of Neuroscience, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Emanuele AmmatunaDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Jan Jacob SchuringaDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Tom van MeertenDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Gerwin HulsDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands.
Edwin BremerDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, 9713 EZ, The Netherlands. e.bremer@umcg.nl.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEJinan University · CN

Funding

Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant 813871Stichting De Cock-Hadders 2022-32Stichting De Cock-Hadders 2022-36
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVISTA is a well-known immune checkpoint in T cell biology, but its role in innate immunity is less established. Here, we investigated the role of VISTA on anticancer macrophage immunity, with a focus on phagocytosis, macrophage polarization and concomitant T cell activation.

methodsMacrophages, differentiated from VISTA overexpressed THP-1 cells and cord blood CD34

resultsEctopic expression of VISTA in the monocytic model cell line THP-1 or in primary monocytes triggered differentiation towards the macrophage lineage, with a marked increase in M2-like macrophage-related gene expression and decrease in M1-like macrophage-related gene expression. VISTA expression in THP-1 and monocyte-derived macrophages strongly downregulated expression of SIRPα, a prominent 'don't eat me' signal, and augmented phagocytic activity of macrophages against cancer cells. Intriguingly, expression of VISTA's extracellular domain alone sufficed to trigger phagocytosis in ∼ 50% of cell lines, with those cell lines also directly binding to recombinant human VISTA, indicating ligand-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Endogenous VISTA expression was predominantly higher in M2-like macrophages compared to M0- or M1-like macrophages, with a positive correlation observed between VISTA expression in M2c macrophages and their phagocytic activity. VISTA-expressing macrophages demonstrated a unique cytokine profile, characterized by reduced IL-1β and elevated IL-10 secretion. Furthermore, VISTA interacted with MHC-I and downregulated its surface expression, leading to diminished T cell activation. Notably, VISTA surface expression was identified in monocytes from all lymphoma patients but was less prevalent in healthy donors.

conclusionsCollectively, VISTA expression associates with and drives M2-like activation of macrophages with a high phagocytic capacity yet a decrease in antigen presentation capability to T cells. Therefore, VISTA is a negative immune checkpoint regulator in macrophage-mediated immune suppression.

Indexed as

Immune checkpointInnate immunityMacrophage biologyPhagocytosisVISTA

Identifiers

PMID38553748
PMCPMC10979580
OpenAlexW4393315964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.