Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38553703›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Robot-assisted surgery and artificial intelligence-based tumour diagnostics: social preferences with a representative cross-sectional survey.

Áron Hölgyesi, Zsombor Zrubka, László Gulácsi, Petra Baji, Tamás Haidegger, Miklós Kozlovszky, Miklós Weszl, Levente Kovács, Márta Péntek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The value of social robots supporting informal care: a discrete choice experiment among informal caregivers.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Áron HölgyesiDoctoral School, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. holgyesi.aron@uni-obuda.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-8131-2839
Zsombor ZrubkaHealth Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK), Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1992-6087
László GulácsiHealth Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK), Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9285-8746
Petra BajiMusculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2899-8557
Tamás HaideggerAntal Bejczy Center for Intelligent Robotics, University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK) , Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1402-1139
Miklós KozlovszkyBioTech Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK) , Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8096-9628
Miklós WeszlDepartment of Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8000-4367
Levente KovácsPhysiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK) , Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-0800
Márta PéntekHealth Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center (EKIK), Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9636-6012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess social preferences for two different advanced digital health technologies and investigate the contextual dependency of the preferences.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was performed among the general population of Hungary aged 40 years and over. Participants were asked to imagine that they needed a total hip replacement surgery and to indicate whether they would prefer a traditional or a robot-assisted (RA) hip surgery. To better understand preferences for the chosen method, the willingness to pay (WTP) method was used. The same assessment was conducted for preferences between a radiologist's and AI-based image analysis in establishing the radiological diagnosis of a suspected tumour. Respondents' electronic health literacy was assessed with the eHEALS questionnaire. Descriptive methods were used to assess sample characteristics and differences between subgroups. Associations were investigated with correlation analysis and multiple linear regressions.

resultsAltogether, 1400 individuals (53.7% female) with a mean age of 58.3 (SD = 11.1) years filled in the survey. RA hip surgery was chosen by 762 (54.4%) respondents, but only 470 (33.6%) chose AI-based medical image evaluation. Those who opted for the digital technology had significantly higher educational levels and electronic health literacy (eHEALS). The majority of respondents were willing to pay to secure their preferred surgical (surgeon 67.2%, robot-assisted: 68.8%) and image assessment (radiologist: 70.9%; AI: 77.4%) methods, reporting similar average amounts in the first (p = 0.677), and a significantly higher average amount for radiologist vs. AI in the second task (p = 0.001). The regression showed a significant association between WTP and income, and in the hip surgery task, it also revealed an association with the type of intervention chosen.

conclusionsIndividuals with higher education levels seem to accept the advanced digital medical technologies more. However, the greater openness for RA surgery than for AI image assessment highlights that social preferences may depend considerably on the medical situation and the type of advanced digital technology. WTP results suggest rather firm preferences in the great majority of the cases. Determinants of preferences and real-world choices of affected patients should be further investigated in future studies.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial Behavior DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesArtificial intelligenceDiagnostic imagingPublic opinionRobotic surgical proceduresSocial preferenceWillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID38553703
PMCPMC10981282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.