SynthesisActa neurologica Belgica2024
Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin retreatment amongst Guillain-Barré syndrome patients who poorly responded to initial IVIG cycle: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Progress in Diagnosis, Biomarkers, Neuroimaging and Management.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSmall cross-sectional studies and case reports observed improvement after administration of second IVIG dose (SID) amongst Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) patients not responsive to initial IVIG cycle. Nevertheless, recent clinical trial and larger observational studies did not find any positive effects of SID. Instead, an increased risk of thromboembolism and mortality was noted. The conclusions of these studies however were not robust as confounding and selection bias were present. METHODOLOGY: Two neurologists conducted the search process (KBA and MBP) using the following terms in Medline: [(" Guillain-Barré Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] or GBS or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy) AND (Poorly Responsive or Poor Prognosis or Progressive)] AND [("Intravenous Immunoglobulin"[MeSH Terms] or IVIG or IGIV) AND (second dose or retreatment or SID)].
resultsOnly 7 articles were included in this review. In terms of primary outcomes, although the cross-sectional study found improvement in GBS DS score at 4 weeks (Median GBS DS: 3 vs 5, p = 0.033) and the 2 case series observed improvement after SID, no significant differences between the control and intervention groups were found in the cohort [Early SIV OR: 0.7 (95% CI 0.16-3.04), Late SIV OR: 0.66 (CI: 0.18-2.5)] and clinical trial studies (Adjusted OR: 1.4 (95% CI:0.6-3.3, p = 0.45). Moreover, 4 patients who died in the clinical trial were from the intervention group.
conclusionBased on studies with research designs of higher quality, SID is not effective in the management of GBS patients who poorly responded to initial IVIG. Nevertheless, an adequately powered, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, using GBS-DS of 3 and above after first IVIG dose should be done to effectively establish the efficacy and safety of SID as intervention for this cohort of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.