ReviewNPJ digital medicine2024
Foundation metrics for evaluating effectiveness of healthcare conversations powered by generative AI.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- The Impact of Chatbot Type and Normative Messaging on Chatbot Usage Intention Based on the Health Technology Acceptance Model: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- A Conversational Agent for Providing Personalized Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Support: Protocol for Chatbot Implementation and Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Making medical AI benchmarks clinically interpretable: the case of mental health.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Validating LLM judges for automated oversight of patient communication.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Distress Rating in Korean Psycho-Oncology Interviews: Exploratory Clinician-Benchmarked Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Iterative Multidisciplinary Development and Evaluation of a Patient-Facing Social Determinants of Health Chatbot Using Synthetic Data Simulation: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- AI Chatbot Use and Disclosure for Mental Health Among US Adolescents and Young Adults.JAMA pediatrics · 2026Article
- Metrics Used for the Evaluation of Chatbots Providing Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment and Education: Systematic Review.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Large Language Models for Postoperative Decision Support: Comparative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Factors Shaping Trust and Satisfaction With AI Medical Chatbots: A Mixed Methods Vignette Survey of Caregivers Seeking Guidance on Pediatric Infectious Diseases.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Structured Large Language Model Workflows for Motivational Interviewing in Health Behavior Change: Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Performance of DeepSeek V3.2 and ChatGPT 5.1 in Musculoskeletal Triage and Differential Diagnosis of Outpatients With Low Back Pain: Multidimensional Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Breast and Cervical Cancers Communication: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study Assessing Linguistic Quality, Safety, and Accessibility.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Voice-controlled super-resolution ultrasound imaging and reporting powered by multimodal large language models.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical artificial intelligence applications of vision-language foundation models.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Open-source large language model-based on-premises pipeline for automated data extraction from unstructured electronic health records: a pilot study.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Patient-friendly simplification and translation of neuroradiology impressions using artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Beginner's Guide to Applying Large Language Models in Behavioral Interventions.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence is set to revolutionize healthcare delivery by transforming traditional patient care into a more personalized, efficient, and proactive process. Chatbots, serving as interactive conversational models, will probably drive this patient-centered transformation in healthcare. Through the provision of various services, including diagnosis, personalized lifestyle recommendations, dynamic scheduling of follow-ups, and mental health support, the objective is to substantially augment patient health outcomes, all the while mitigating the workload burden on healthcare providers. The life-critical nature of healthcare applications necessitates establishing a unified and comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for conversational models. Existing evaluation metrics proposed for various generic large language models (LLMs) demonstrate a lack of comprehension regarding medical and health concepts and their significance in promoting patients' well-being. Moreover, these metrics neglect pivotal user-centered aspects, including trust-building, ethics, personalization, empathy, user comprehension, and emotional support. The purpose of this paper is to explore state-of-the-art LLM-based evaluation metrics that are specifically applicable to the assessment of interactive conversational models in healthcare. Subsequently, we present a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics designed to thoroughly assess the performance of healthcare chatbots from an end-user perspective. These metrics encompass an evaluation of language processing abilities, impact on real-world clinical tasks, and effectiveness in user-interactive conversations. Finally, we engage in a discussion concerning the challenges associated with defining and implementing these metrics, with particular emphasis on confounding factors such as the target audience, evaluation methods, and prompt techniques involved in the evaluation process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.