Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38553527›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Predictors of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir receipt among COVID-19 patients in a large US health system.

Deborah E Malden, John M McLaughlin, Vennis Hong, Joseph Lewnard, Bradley K Ackerson, Laura Puzniak, Jeniffer S Kim, Harpreet Takhar, Timothy B Frankland, Jeff M Slezak and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah E MaldenDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. Debbie.E.Malden@kp.org.
John M McLaughlinPfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Vennis HongDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Joseph LewnardDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Bradley K AckersonDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Laura PuzniakPfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Jeniffer S KimDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Harpreet TakharDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Timothy B FranklandDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Jeff M SlezakDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Sara Y TartofDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 South Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. Sara.Y.Tartof@kp.org.
Kaiser Permanente · USPfizer (United States) · USBerkeley College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A clear understanding of real-world uptake of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 can inform treatment allocation strategies and improve interpretation of effectiveness studies. We used data from a large US healthcare system to describe nirmatrelvir-ritonavir dispenses among all SARS-CoV-2 positive patients aged ≥ 12 years meeting recommended National Institutes of Health treatment eligibility criteria for the study period between 1 January and 31 December, 2022. Overall, 10.9% (N = 34,791/319,900) of treatment eligible patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir over the study period. Although uptake of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir increased over time, by the end of 2022, less than a quarter of treatment eligible patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections had received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. Across patient demographics, treatment was generally consistent with tiered treatment guidelines, with dispenses concentrated among patients aged ≥ 65 years (14,706/63,921; 23.0%), and with multiple comorbidities (10,989/54,431; 20.1%). However, neighborhoods of lower socioeconomic status (upper third of neighborhood deprivation index [NDI]) had between 12% (95% CI: 7-18%) and 28% (25-32%) lower odds of treatment dispense over the time periods studied compared to the lower third of NDI distribution, even after accounting for demographic and clinical characteristics. A limited chart review (N = 40) confirmed that in some cases a decision not to treat was appropriate and aligned with national guidelines to use clinical judgement on a case-by-case basis. There is a need to enhance patient and provider awareness on the availability and benefits of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 illness.

Indexed as

COVID-19LactamsLeucineNitrilesProlineAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansRitonavirSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsLactamsLeucinenirmatrelvirNitrilesProlineRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID38553527
PMCPMC10980791
OpenAlexW4393317118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.