Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38553049›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Guidance on sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health in humanitarian and fragile settings: a scoping review.

Mehr Gul Shah, Teesta Dey, Sophie Marie Kostelecky, Maria El Bizri, Mariana Rodo, Neha S Singh, Samira Aboubaker, Egmond Samir Evers, Per Ashorn, Etienne V Langlois

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehr Gul ShahThe Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland mehr.shah@outlook.com.
Teesta DeyThe Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sophie Marie KosteleckyThe Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9371-4333
Maria El BizriThe Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mariana RodoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Neha S SinghDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0057-121X
Samira AboubakerIndependent Consultant, Bellevue, Switzerland.
Egmond Samir EversDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Per AshornFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-2593
Etienne V LangloisThe Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-2511
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBTampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProgress related to sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) has stalled. COVID-19, conflict and climate change threaten to reverse decades of progress and to ensure the health and well-being of vulnerable populations in humanitarian and fragile settings (HFS) going forward, there is a need for tailored guidance for women, children and adolescents (WCA). This review seeks to map and appraise current resources on SRMNCAH in HFS.

methodsIn line with the updated Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews framework, a manual literature review was conducted of global and regional guidance published between January 2008 and May 2023 from members of the Global Health Cluster, the Global Nutrition Cluster and the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises. A content analysis was conducted. Scores were then calculated according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II scoring tool and subsequently categorised as high quality or low quality.

resultsA total of 730 documents were identified. Of these, 141 met the selection criteria and were analysed. Available guidance for delivering SRMNCH services exists, which can inform policy and programming for the general population and WCA. Important gaps related to beneficiaries, health services and health system strengthening strategies were identified.

conclusionThe review revealed there is evidence-based guidance available to support interventions targeting WCA in HFS, including: pregnant and lactating women, women of reproductive age, adolescents, newborns, small vulnerable newborns, stillbirths, refugees and internally displaced persons and WCA with disabilities. However, gaps related to beneficiaries, health services and health system strengthening strategies must be addressed in updated guidance that is created, disseminated and monitored in a standardised way that is mindful of the need to respond rapidly in HFS.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthReproductive HealthAdolescentAltruismChildChild HealthCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornMaternal HealthPregnancySexual HealthHealth systemsHealth systems evaluationMaternal healthPublic HealthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38553049
PMCPMC10982774
OpenAlexW4393321726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.