ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Spine2024
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model to accurately predict spinopelvic parameters.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence automated measurements of spinopelvic parameters in adult spinal deformity-a systematic review.Spine deformity · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for spinopelvic parameters in standing total spine X-ray and limitations after fusion surgery.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI model for automatic spinopelvic and spinal alignment parameters measurement from EOS.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based estimation of sagittal spinal alignment from coronal radiographs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in ASD treatment.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in severe rigid Scoliosis: Opportunities, challenges, and the road ahead.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Review
- Current Applications and Future Directions of Technologies Used in Adult Deformity Surgery for Personalized Alignment: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of AI Performance in Spinal Radiographic Measurements Compared to Radiologists: A Study of Accuracy and Efficiency.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a keypoint region-based convolutional neural network to automate thoracic Cobb angle measurements using whole-spine standing radiographs.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Utility of Enabling Technologies in Spinal Deformity Surgery: Optimizing Surgical Planning and Intraoperative Execution to Maximize Patient Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Care: Advancements in Bone Care and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Investigation of spinopelvic sagittal alignment and its correlations in asymptomatic pediatric populations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAchieving appropriate spinopelvic alignment has been shown to be associated with improved clinical symptoms. However, measurement of spinopelvic radiographic parameters is time-intensive and interobserver reliability is a concern. Automated measurement tools have the promise of rapid and consistent measurements, but existing tools are still limited to some degree by manual user-entry requirements. This study presents a novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool called SpinePose that automatically predicts spinopelvic parameters with high accuracy without the need for manual entry.
methodsSpinePose was trained and validated on 761 sagittal whole-spine radiographs to predict the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), T1 pelvic angle (T1PA), and L1 pelvic angle (L1PA). A separate test set of 40 radiographs was labeled by four reviewers, including fellowship-trained spine surgeons and a fellowship-trained radiologist with neuroradiology subspecialty certification. Median errors relative to the most senior reviewer were calculated to determine model accuracy on test images. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess interrater reliability.
resultsSpinePose exhibited the following median (interquartile range) parameter errors: SVA 2.2 mm (2.3 mm) (p = 0.93), PT 1.3° (1.2°) (p = 0.48), SS 1.7° (2.2°) (p = 0.64), PI 2.2° (2.1°) (p = 0.24), LL 2.6° (4.0°) (p = 0.89), T1PA 1.1° (0.9°) (p = 0.42), and L1PA 1.4° (1.6°) (p = 0.49). Model predictions also exhibited excellent reliability at all parameters (ICC 0.91-1.0).
conclusionsSpinePose accurately predicted spinopelvic parameters with excellent reliability comparable to that of fellowship-trained spine surgeons and neuroradiologists. Utilization of predictive AI tools in spinal imaging can substantially aid in patient selection and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.