Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38551989›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Amplifiers of selection for the Moran process with both Birth-death and death-Birth updating.

Jakub Svoboda, Soham Joshi, Josef Tkadlec, Krishnendu Chatterjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mixed updating in structured populations.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Promoters of cooperation in evolutionary games.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Colonization times in Moran process on graphs.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Fixation times on directed graphs.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakub SvobodaIST Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-3267
Soham JoshiIST Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0009-0002-9987-8106
Josef TkadlecComputer Science Institute, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1097-9684
Krishnendu ChatterjeeIST Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-241X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations evolve by accumulating advantageous mutations. Every population has some spatial structure that can be modeled by an underlying network. The network then influences the probability that new advantageous mutations fixate. Amplifiers of selection are networks that increase the fixation probability of advantageous mutants, as compared to the unstructured fully-connected network. Whether or not a network is an amplifier depends on the choice of the random process that governs the evolutionary dynamics. Two popular choices are Moran process with Birth-death updating and Moran process with death-Birth updating. Interestingly, while some networks are amplifiers under Birth-death updating and other networks are amplifiers under death-Birth updating, so far no spatial structures have been found that function as an amplifier under both types of updating simultaneously. In this work, we identify networks that act as amplifiers of selection under both versions of the Moran process. The amplifiers are robust, modular, and increase fixation probability for any mutant fitness advantage in a range r ∈ (1, 1.2). To complement this positive result, we also prove that for certain quantities closely related to fixation probability, it is impossible to improve them simultaneously for both versions of the Moran process. Together, our results highlight how the two versions of the Moran process differ and what they have in common.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalMutationPopulation DynamicsProbabilitySelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID38551989
PMCPMC11006194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.