Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38551926›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2024

Gut microbiota differences in stunted and normal-lenght children aged 36-45 months in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.

Ingrid S Surono, Ilia Popov, Sanne Verbruggen, Jessica Verhoeven, Pratiwi D Kusumo, Koen Venema

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05119218 (Gut Microbiota Profile, SCFA, Gut Integrity, Parasite Infection, Hygiene Practice and Cognitive Score on Stunted Children in East Nusa Tenggara), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05119218 completednot on this map

Gut Microbiota Profile, SCFA, Gut Integrity, Parasite Infection, Hygiene Practice and Cognitive Score on Stunted Children in East Nusa Tenggara

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBina Nusantara UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsStuntingArmsNo Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The gut microbiota in malnutrition.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Clostridium Abundance and Lower Weight-for-AgeJMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ingrid S SuronoFaculty of Engineering, Food Technology Department, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ilia PopovFaculty of Engineering, Food Technology Department, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-7947-1654
Sanne VerbruggenCentre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation, Maastricht University-Campus Venlo, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Jessica VerhoevenCentre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation, Maastricht University-Campus Venlo, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Pratiwi D KusumoFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Koen VenemaCentre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation, Maastricht University-Campus Venlo, Venlo, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7046-5127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the gut microbiota in energy metabolism of the host has been established, both in overweight/obesity, as well as in undernutrition/stunting. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota may predispose to stunting. The aim of this study was to compare the gut microbiota composition of stunted Indonesian children and non-stunted children between 36 and 45 months from two sites on the East Nusa Tenggara (ENT) islands. Fecal samples were collected from 100 stunted children and 100 non-stunted children in Kupang and North Kodi. The gut microbiota composition was determined by sequencing amplicons of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Moreover, fecal SCFA concentrations were analyzed. The microbiota composition was correlated to anthropometric parameters and fecal metabolites. The phyla Bacteroidetes (Bacteroidota; q = 0.014) and Cyanobacteria (q = 0.049) were significantly higher in stunted children. Three taxa at genus levels were consistently significantly higher in stunted children at both sampling sites, namely Lachnoclostridium, Faecalibacterium and Veillonella (q < 7 * 10-4). These and 9 other taxa positively correlated to the z-score length-for-age (zlen), while 11 taxa negatively correlated with zlen. Several taxa also correlated with sanitary parameters, some of which were also significantly different between the two groups. All three fecal SCFA concentrations (acetate, propionate and butyrate) and their total were lower in stunted children compared to non-stunted children, although not significant for butyrate, indicating lower energy-extraction by the gut microbiota. Also, since SCFA have been shown to be involved in gut barrier function, barrier integrity may be affected in the stunted children. It remains to be seen if the three taxa are involved in stunting, or are changed due to e.g. differences in diet, hygiene status, or other factors. The observed differences in this study do not agree with our previous observations in children on Java, Indonesia. There are differences in infrastructure facilities such as clean water and sanitation on ENT and Java, which may contribute to the differences observed. The role of the gut microbiota in stunting therefore requires more in depth studies. Trial registration: the trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier number NCT05119218.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGrowth DisordersBacteroidetesButyratesChild, PreschoolFecesHumansIndonesiaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoutheast Asian PeopleButyratesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38551926
PMCPMC10980242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.