ArticlePloS one2024
Using network science to examine audio-visual speech perception with a multi-layer graph.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine visual speech perception (i.e., lip-reading), we created a multi-layer network (the AV-net) that contained: (1) an auditory layer with nodes representing phonological word-forms and edges connecting words that were phonologically related, and (2) a visual layer with nodes representing the viseme representations of words and edges connecting viseme representations that differed by a single viseme (and additional edges to connect related nodes in the two layers). The results of several computer simulations (in which activation diffused across the network to simulate word identification) are reported and compared to the performance of human participants who identified the same words in a condition in which audio and visual information were both presented (Simulation 1), in an audio-only presentation condition (Simulation 2), and a visual-only presentation condition (Simulation 3). Another simulation (Simulation 4) examined the influence of phonological information on visual speech perception by comparing performance in the multi-layer AV-net to a single-layer network that contained only a visual layer with nodes representing the viseme representations of words and edges connecting viseme representations that differed by a single viseme. We also report the results of several analyses of the errors made by human participants in the visual-only presentation condition. The results of our analyses have implications for future research and training of lip-reading, and for the development of automatic lip-reading devices and software for individuals with certain developmental or acquired disorders or for listeners with normal hearing in noisy conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.