ArticleBlood advances2024
Integrated analyses reveal unexpected complex inversion and recombination in RH genes.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- An RHD gene variant, common in southern Chinese Han, involves a short 688 bp deletion and a long 21.8 kb insertion in the RHD exon 10 non-coding region, affecting the accuracy of red cell genotyping.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Proof-of-principle: nanopore adaptive sampling enables full blood group genome analysis and resolution of hybrid alleles.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Molecular advances in transfusion medicine: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- RH gene inversion-recombination as a major mechanism of the D phenotype in China.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPhenotype D-- is associated with severe hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. It is typically caused by defective RHCE genes. In this study, we identified a D-- phenotype proband and verified Rh phenotypes of other 6 family members. However, inconsistent results between the phenotypic analysis and Sanger sequencing revealed intact RHCE exons with no mutations in the D-- proband, but the protein was not expressed. Subsequent whole-genome sequencing by Oxford Nanopore Technologies of the proband revealed an inversion with ambiguous breakpoints in intron 2 and intron 7 and copy number variation loss in the RHCE gene region. Given that the RHCE gene is highly homologous to the RHD gene, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using Pacific Biosciences long-read target sequencing, Bionano optical genome mapping, and targeted next-generation sequencing. Our findings revealed that the proband had 2 novel recombinant RHCE haplotypes, RHCE∗Ce(1-2)-D(3-10) and RHCE∗Ce(1-2)-D(3-10)-Ce(10-8)-Ce(3-10), with clear-cut breakpoints identified. Furthermore, the RH haplotypes of the family members were identified and verified. In summary, we made, to our knowledge, a novel discovery of hereditary large inversion and recombination events occurring between the RHD and RHCE genes, leading to a lack of RhCE expression. This highlights the advantages of using integrated genetic analyses and also provides new insights into RH genotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.