Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38551772›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2024

The impact of large language models on radiology: a guide for radiologists on the latest innovations in AI.

Takeshi Nakaura, Rintaro Ito, Daiju Ueda, Taiki Nozaki, Yasutaka Fushimi, Yusuke Matsui, Masahiro Yanagawa, Akira Yamada, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Noriyuki Fujima and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial superintelligence alignment in healthcare.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Recent Advances in Musculoskeletal Radiology: Bridging Innovation and Clinical Application.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Takeshi NakauraDepartment of Central Radiology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Honjo 1-1-1, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. kff00712@nifty.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9010-0341
Rintaro ItoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Daiju UedaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1‑4‑3 Asahi‑Machi, Abeno‑ku, Osaka, 545‑8585, Japan.
Taiki NozakiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku‑ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasutaka FushimiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Sakyoku, Kyoto, Japan.
Yusuke MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Kita‑ku, Okayama, Japan.
Masahiro YanagawaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, Japan.
Akira YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Takahiro TsuboyamaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, Japan.
Noriyuki FujimaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Fuminari TatsugamiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Minami‑ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kenji HirataDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita‑ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shohei FujitaDepartment of Radiology, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo‑ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji KamagataDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo‑ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyuki FujiokaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo‑ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko KawamuraDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of Deep Learning (DL) has significantly propelled the field of diagnostic radiology forward by enhancing image analysis and interpretation. The introduction of the Transformer architecture, followed by the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), has further revolutionized this domain. LLMs now possess the potential to automate and refine the radiology workflow, extending from report generation to assistance in diagnostics and patient care. The integration of multimodal technology with LLMs could potentially leapfrog these applications to unprecedented levels.However, LLMs come with unresolved challenges such as information hallucinations and biases, which can affect clinical reliability. Despite these issues, the legislative and guideline frameworks have yet to catch up with technological advancements. Radiologists must acquire a thorough understanding of these technologies to leverage LLMs' potential to the fullest while maintaining medical safety and ethics. This review aims to aid in that endeavor.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiologyArtificial IntelligenceHumansRadiologistsWorkflowArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiagnostic radiologyLarge language modelRadiological workflow

Identifiers

PMID38551772
PMCPMC11217134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.