ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Combining High-Density Fat and Condensed Low-Density Fat Injections for Precise Facial Rejuvenation.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategic application of multilayer fat grafting in facial rejuvenation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFacial aging involves ptosis, adipose atrophy, and skeletal resorption. Depletion of adipose tissue primarily affects the deep facial fat compartment, leading to facial depression or ptosis, accompanied by atrophy of the superficial compartment. Restoring volume in the deep fat compartment is crucial for facial rejuvenation, while enhancing its supportive properties is also important. The superficial fat compartment contains small-sized adipocytes, and autologous fat grafting is a popular approach. However, variability in fat retention, homogeneity, and processing methods can impact outcomes, necessitating careful selection of a suitable fat processing material for precise facial fat grafting.
methodA retrospective study was conducted on 50 patients who underwent facial augmentation using combined transplantation of high-density fat (HDF) and condensed low-density fat (CLDF) and 25 patients who underwent conventional Coleman fat grafting. Coleman fat was harvested by standard technique and the adipose tissue was divided into HDF and CLDF fractions through centrifugation. Subsequently, the low-density fat fraction was subjected to a process involving physical disruption followed by additional centrifugation to obtain CLDF. The CLDF fraction was consequently injected into the pre-SMAS subcutaneous layer of the superficial fat compartments. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a typical Likert scale. Photographs were taken and imageological examinations were performed before and after treatment.
resultThe CLDF+HDF grafting group demonstrated a significantly shorter duration of swelling (6.0 ± 1.2 to 12.6 ± 3.3 days) and higher level of patient satisfaction when compared to the Coleman fat group. No serious complications were observed among all the patients who received the injections.
conclusionThe use of this new treatment approach allows for precise fat transplantation in facial regions. The use of high-concentration fat filling for deep facial layers and CLDF filling for superficial layers is a safe and effective treatment plan for facial rejuvenation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.