Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38551520›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2024

Evidence-based recommendations for the rehabilitation and management of the ageing population with spinal cord injury: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

Vanessa Seijas, Lorena Schrepfer, Ana M Posada, María A Spir, Barbara Machado, Diana Sigrist-Nix, Anke Scheel-Sailer, Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Carla Sabariego

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. 'From Superman to Barely Can:' The Experience of Ageing for Australians With Spinal Cord Injury Sustained Below the Age of 65-A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vanessa SeijasFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland - vanessa.seijas@unilu.ch.
Lorena SchrepferFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Ana M PosadaRehabilitation in Health Research Group, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
María A SpirRehabilitation in Health Research Group, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Barbara MachadoFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Diana Sigrist-NixSwiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Anke Scheel-SailerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Inge Eriks-HooglandFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Carla SabariegoFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe intersection of ageing and spinal cord injury (SCI) is of global concern. Two scenarios have been described: 1) "SCI with ageing," an increase in the average age of SCI onset, and 2) "ageing with SCI," an increase in post-injury life expectancy. These scenarios entail complex health care and rehabilitation needs due to the accumulation of comorbidities, ageing-related and SCI-induced physiological changes, and post-SCI secondary health conditions. We systematically reviewed Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) with the objective of identifying the extent to which SCI CPGs include recommendations for the rehabilitation and management of people who are "ageing with SCI" or who have acquired an "SCI with ageing". We termed these as "ageing-related recommendations". We also aimed to describe them and identify gaps. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched PubMed (NCBI), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost) and Embase (Elsevier) for relevant CPGs between 28 December 2022 and 5 January 2023. Included CPGs were evidence-based and had at least one ageing-related recommendation for SCI rehabilitation and management. We used the two core sets of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to identify gaps. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Only 16 (30%) of the 52 identified CPGs included ageing-related recommendations. Most were recent US or European publications and lacked specific chapters on ageing. These CPGs included 40 ageing-related recommendations, mostly "strong" but based on "low" to "very low" quality of evidence. The overall quality of the development process was low and did not consider the values and preferences of stakeholders and patients. Common topics included cardiovascular, bone, metabolic, bowel, bladder, and skin health. The recommendations could be linked to 30 ICF categories which represented only 18% of the ICF categories included in the comprehensive versions of two ICF Core Sets. Key gaps were found in mobility, interpersonal interactions, and relationships, neuromusculoskeletal and movement-related, mental, sensory and pain functions.

conclusionsThere is a notable lack of high-quality ageing-related recommendations for SCI management and rehabilitation. Future research should prioritize the generation of high-quality evidence to develop age-sensitive CPGs. Future SCI CPGs need to address the complex challenges at the interface of ageing and SCI, considering patient and stakeholder preferences.

Indexed as

AgingPractice Guidelines as TopicSpinal Cord InjuriesAgedEvidence-Based MedicineHumans

Identifiers

PMID38551520
PMCPMC11255876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.