Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38551346›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2024

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of fosmanogepix IV to oral switch and multiple IV doses in healthy participants.

Michael R Hodges, Susan Hazel, William G Kramer, Ewoud-Jan van Hoogdalem, Sjoerd van Marle, Margaret Tawadrous, Abhijeet Jakate

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fosmanogepix Treatment for Coccidioidomycosis Under an Expanded Access Program.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Fosmanogepix.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. MultisystemASM case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A Mini-Review of In Vitro Data forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael R HodgesAmplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Susan HazelAmplyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
William G KramerKramer Consulting LLC, North Potomac, Maryland, USA.
Ewoud-Jan van HoogdalemICON, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd van MarleICON, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Margaret TawadrousPfizer Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-2647
Abhijeet JakatePfizer Inc., New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2196-5782
Pfizer (United States) · USAmplyx Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

Amplyx (Amplyx Pharmaceuticals)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fosmanogepix [FMGX, APX001; active form: manogepix (MGX), APX001A] is a first-in-class, intravenous (IV)/oral antifungal currently being evaluated for invasive fungal disease treatment. Data from two phase 1, placebo-controlled studies [IV-oral switch (study 1) and multiple IV doses (study 2)] evaluating FMGX tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) are presented. Healthy adults (study 1: 18-65 years; study 2: 18-55 years) were eligible (randomized 3:1 to FMGX: placebo). Eleven participants completed study 1. In study 2, 51 participants (48 planned + 3 replacement) were enrolled in six cohorts (8 participants each; 34 completed the study). In study 1, overall MGX systemic exposures were comparable from day 1 to day 42 of dosing; steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved in ≤24 h following two IV loading doses (1,000 mg) and exposures maintained after switching [IV (600 mg) to daily oral doses (800 mg)]. FMGX was safe and well-tolerated. In study 2, FMGX IV doses (loading doses twice daily/maintenance doses once daily; 3-h infusion) of 1,500/900 mg (cohort A), 900/900 mg (cohort B), and 1,000/900 mg (cohort C: with ondansetron) were not well-tolerated; most participants reported nausea and infrequent vomiting. FMGX IV doses of 1,000/750 mg (cohort D), 1,000/850 mg (cohort E), and 1,000/900 mg (cohort F: ondansetron prn) were relatively better tolerated. Steady-state systemic exposures were achieved between days 2 and 4. All cohorts had similar geometric mean (GM) concentrations during maintenance dosing and similar GM PK parameters. Dosing regimen evaluated in study 1 was safe, well-tolerated, and may be used for future clinical evaluations.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsHealthy VolunteersAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntifungal Agentsantifungalsfosmanogepix (FMGX)intravenousinvasive fungal diseasesmanogepix (MGX)

Identifiers

PMID38551346
PMCPMC11064621
OpenAlexW4393318219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.