ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024
Qualitative and quantitative imaging features of solid pancreas tumours in portal venous phase CT: are they useful in determining tumour type and grade?
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic prediction of primary liver cancer following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with targeted immunotherapy based on CT morphological characteristics.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Solid pancreatic lesions might have overlapping findings in portal venous phase computed tomography (CT). In this study, we aimed to investigate the quantitative and qualitative imaging features of solid pancreas lesions based on subtype and grade. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 159 patients with solid pancreatic tumours detected after exclusion criteria. According to the pathology results, the patients were divided into 3 groups as PDAC (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, tumour localisation, and internal structure ( Conclusions: While ill-defined irregular margins, hypodense visual tumour density, no cystic component, low value of Tm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.