ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024
Preoperative embolisation of renal cell carcinoma metastases to the spine - evaluation of procedural and clinical outcome.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the fourth most common metastatic tumour of the spine. RCC metastases are highly vascular and might cause life-threatening intraoperative bleeding. That is why preoperative embolisation is performed to reduce intraoperative blood loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the procedural and clinical outcomes of preoperative embolisation of RCC metastases to the vertebral column. Material and methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, data of 59 consecutive patients undergoing endovascular treatment prior to surgical resection were collected and evaluated. In all cases superselective catheterisation and occlusion of feeding vessels was attempted and performed if deemed safe and possible. Completeness of embolisation, procedural details, and the complication rate were evaluated. Surgical procedures were carried out within 48 hours after embolisation. The surgical approach was dependent on the anatomical site and osseous destruction. Intraoperative blood loss was estimated. Results: Fifty-nine patients with a mean age of 63 years were included. Complete embolisation was successful in 76% (45/59) and partial in 15% (9/59). Microspheres were the most commonly used embolic material. In 5 cases (8%) safe occlusion was not possible due to the radiculomedullary artery originating from the same pedicle as the tumour. Minor complications (vomiting, increased pain) occurred in 8 patients. Paraplegia (one transient and one permanent) was noted in 2 cases. Estimated intraoperative blood loss was 830 ± 410 ml. Conclusions: The results of our study show that preoperative embolisation is a feasible and effective method with a relatively high rate of occlusion and low complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.