Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550756›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Differential involvement of the senses in disgust memories.

Elliott Lamond, Supreet Saluja, Chloe Hislop, Richard J Stevenson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elliott Lamond *Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-5949
Supreet Saluja *Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-6171
Chloe HislopDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.
Richard J StevensonDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-5777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One prediction derived from the disease avoidance account of disgust is that proximal disgust cues (smells, tastes and touches) should elicit this emotion more intensely than distal disgust cues (sights and sounds). If correct, then memories of disgusting experiences should involve smelling, tasting or touching to a greater degree than seeing or hearing. Two surveys were conducted on university students to test this idea, drawing upon their naturalistic experiences. Survey 1 (

Indexed as

disgustmemoriesnatural experiencessmelltastetouch

Identifiers

PMID38550756
PMCPMC10977387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.