Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550753›Full record

ArticleScientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading2021

Probing Phonological Processing Differences in Nonword Repetition for Children with Separate or Co-occurring Dyslexia and Developmental Language Disorder.

Anna Ehrhorn, Suzanne Adlof, Daniel Fogerty, Spencer Laing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna EhrhornDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders University of South Carolina.
Suzanne AdlofDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders University of South Carolina.
Daniel FogertyDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders University of South Carolina.
Spencer LaingDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders University of South Carolina.

Funding

Word Learning in Reading and Language Impairment SubgroupsR01DC017156 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI ADLOF, SUZANNE M. · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Word Learning in Language and Reading Impairment SubgroupsR03DC013399 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI ADLOF, SUZANNE M. · 2013 to 2015
$436k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017156NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed nonword repetition (NWR) skills in 7-9 year-old children with dyslexia (dyslexia-only), developmental language disorder (DLD-only), co-occurring DLD+dyslexia, and typical development (TD) with a norm-referenced and an experimental task. The experimental task manipulated phonemic variability (dissimilarity among consonant phonemes within the nonword) and presentation modality (audio-only versus audiovisual) to probe potential phonological processing differences among the groups. Across tasks, the dyslexia-only and DLD-only groups performed similarly to each other and intermediately to the TD and DLD+dyslexia groups. In the experimental task, nonwords with low phonemic variability were produced less accurately in both modalities, and audiovisual presentation facilitated accurate repetition of low phonemic variability nonwords. A lack of a group interaction with phonemic variability or presentation modality suggests similarities, despite group differences, in how underlying phonological representations influence task performance. Overall, results suggest that poor NWR is associated with both dyslexia and DLD, and that co-occurrence compounds this difficulty.

Indexed as

DyslexiaLanguage ImpairmentNonword RepetitionPhonological ProcessingSchool-Aged Children

Identifiers

PMID38550753
PMCPMC10977320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.