ArticleSIAM journal on imaging sciences2024
A Majorization-Minimization Algorithm for Neuroimage Registration.
Article in SIAM journal on imaging sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensity-based image registration is critical for neuroimaging tasks, such as 3D reconstruction, times-series alignment, and common coordinate mapping. The gradient-based optimization methods commonly used to solve this problem require a careful selection of step-length. This limitation imposes substantial time and computational costs. Here we propose a gradient-independent rigid-motion registration algorithm based on the majorization-minimization (MM) principle. Each iteration of our intensity-based MM algorithm reduces to a simple point-set rigid registration problem with a closed form solution that avoids the step-length issue altogether. The details of the algorithm are presented, and an error bound for its more practical truncated form is derived. The performance of the MM algorithm is shown to be more effective than gradient descent on simulated images and Nissl stained coronal slices of mouse brain. We also compare and contrast the similarities and differences between the MM algorithm and another gradient-free registration algorithm called the block-matching method. Finally, extensions of this algorithm to more complex problems are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.