ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024
Operational disruption in healthcare associated with software functionality issue due to software security patching: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and experiences of quality improvement interventions in older care: a mixed-methods systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Quality Monitoring for Type 2 Diabetes in Swiss Primary Care: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Frugal-Oriented Information and Communication Technology for Development Framework Toward Low-Cost Digital Maternal Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Quantitative Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Health Information Technology-Related Loss of Central Surveillance Data in a Heart Intensive Care Unit: Multi-Framework Case Report.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Kenyan Neonatal Mortality Risk Predictor: Protocol for a User-Centered Design Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Contextual Barriers to Health Information Systems Optimization in Underserved Communities in Kenya: Qualitative Study Informed by Frugal Innovation and Information and Communication Technologies for Development.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- A qualitative, multi-framework methodology for analysing health information technology-related patient safety incidents.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The impact of training and education programs for healthcare professionals on video- and text-based consultations in ensuring healthcare quality: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- From emergence to recoverability: a sociotechnical control trajectory theory of HIT-related risk.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Assessing the feasibility of solar-powered digital health infrastructure in rural and peri-urban Kenya: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Governance pathways for scaling neonatal risk stratification tools in LMIC health systems: a multi-site qualitative study in Kenya.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Governance and implementation of solar-powered digital health systems in low- and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods study from Kenya and Ethiopia.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Toward a mixed-methods framework for evaluating digital health systems in low-resource settings: an infrastructure-aware perspective.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Patient misidentification and data integrity risks in ultrasound imaging: a case report using multi-framework incident analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Why health information technology safety problems remain invisible.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Why digital health fails silently: a sociotechnical theory of health information technology-related risk.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Ethical and Quality of Care-Related Challenges of Digital Health Twins in Care Settings for Older Adults: Scoping Review.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of Training and Education Programs for Health Care Professionals on Video and Text-Based Meetings in Ensuring Health Care Quality: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Facilitator and Barrier to Health Information System Use from Health Professionals Perspective: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite many benefits, the extensive deployment of Health Information Technology (HIT) systems by healthcare organizations has encountered many challenges, particularly in the field of telemetry concerning patient monitoring and its operational workflow. These challenges can add more layers of complexity when an unplanned software security patching is performed, affecting patient monitoring and causing disruption in daily clinical operations. This study is a reflection on what happened associated with software security patching and why it happened through the lens of an incident report to develop potential preventive and corrective strategies using qualitative analyses-inductive and deductive approaches. There is a need for such analyses to identify the underlying mechanism behind such issues since very limited research has been conducted on the study of software patching. The incident was classified as a "software functionality" issue, and the consequence was an "incident with a noticeable consequence but no patient harm", and the contributing factor was a software update, i.e., software security patching. This report describes how insufficient planning of software patching, lack of training for healthcare professionals, contingency planning on unplanned system disruption, and HIT system configuration can compromise healthcare quality and cause risks to patient safety. We propose 15 preventive and corrective strategies grouped under four key areas based on the system approach and social-technical aspects of the patching process. The key areas are (i) preparing, developing, and deploying patches; (ii) training the frontline operators; (iii) ensuring contingency planning; and (iv) establishing configuration and communication between systems. These strategies are expected to minimize the risk of HIT-related incidents, enhance software security patch management in healthcare organizations, and improve patient safety. However, further discussion should be continued about general HIT problems connected to software security patching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.