Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550705›Full record

ReviewChemical science2024

Unlocking the potential of nanoscale sulfur in sustainable agriculture.

Yi Sun, Yaqi Jiang, Yuanbo Li, Qibin Wang, Guikai Zhu, Tianjing Yi, Quanlong Wang, Yi Wang, Om Parkash Dhankher, Zhiqiang Tan and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Yi SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.
Yaqi JiangBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.
Yuanbo LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.
Qibin WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.
Guikai ZhuBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.
Tianjing YiBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.
Quanlong WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.
Yi WangThe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station New Haven CT USA Jason.White@ct.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2891-0386
Om Parkash DhankherStockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst MA 01003 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0737-6783
Zhiqiang TanState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100085 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0491-7495
Iseult LynchSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2TT UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-4584
Jason C WhiteThe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station New Haven CT USA Jason.White@ct.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-8143
Yukui RuiBeijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University Beijing 100093 China ruiyukui@163.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-8804
Peng ZhangDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China Anhui 230026 China zhangpeng1987@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2774-5534
China Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNConnecticut Agricultural Experiment Station · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global population is growing rapidly, which poses a significant challenge to food security. Innovation in agricultural technologies is necessary to achieve sustainable development in agriculture and combat food insecurity. Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising tool in agriculture; compared to conventional agricultural chemicals, demonstrated benefits include increased efficiency of delivery and utilization of both nutrients and pesticides, as well as nanoscale-specific stimulation of stress tolerance pathways. Among the many studied nanomaterials, nano-sulfur has demonstrated superior effects at enhancing plant resilience to pathogens and abiotic stresses, as well as improving plant growth and nutritional quality of edible tissues. A number of published studies have investigated the physiological effects (growth promotion, disease resistance) of single or several sulfur and sulfide compounds on crop species. However, there is no systematic analysis of this literature, including the effects and specific mechanisms of various sulfur forms in agricultural applications. In this review, we will discuss the effects of sulfur (including nano-sulfur) on crop species, the underlying mechanisms of action for their transport and transformation in the soil-plant system, and evaluate their suitability in sustainable agricultural development. Additionally, we discuss the current challenges and knowledge gaps for nanoscale sulfur use in agriculture, and describe future research directions to advance our understanding of the sustainable use of this material at the scale of individual fields.

Identifiers

PMID38550705
PMCPMC10967029
OpenAlexW4392395190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.