ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
A Longitudinal Assessment of Self-directed Learning Readiness and Development in Medical Students.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-directed learning readiness in preclinical medical education: Patterns, variation, and academic outcomes from a mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Readiness for self-directed learning among first-year medical and nursing students at the Arabian Gulf University in Bahrain.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- The Relationship Between Comprehensive OSCE Scores and GPA on the Readiness of Undergraduate Medical Students to Undergo Clinical Rotations.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSelf-directed learning (SDL) competency is important for physicians to stay abreast of advances in their field and to provide the best available evidence-based care to their patients. Therefore, an essential responsibility of medical educators is to ensure the development of SDL skills in their students. The first objective of this study was to investigate longitudinally the degree to which medical students were ready to engage in SDL. The second objective was to examine students' perceptions of their SDL development throughout training.
methodsA 2-part study of preclinical and clinical medical students was carried out at a midwestern U.S. university. In Study A, a longitudinal assessment of preclinical medical students' readiness to engage in SDL was conducted by administering an SDL readiness survey (SDLRS). In Study B, third- and fourth-year medical students were asked to reflect on their SDL development, in addition to completing the SDLRS.
resultsAfter validating the Hendry and Ginns version of the SDLRS in preclinical medical students during Study A, we found that 3 of the 4 subscales remained constant over the 3 iterations of the survey while the self-determination subscale increased significantly between the first and third iteration of the survey. In Study B, an analysis of the clinical medical students' comments indicated a perceived increase in their SDL abilities and a growing appreciation of SDL. However, the SDLRS scores of clinical students did not differ from the results observed in preclinical students in Study A.
conclusionsThe results of the SDLRS indicated that the experience of students in our medical school has a positive influence on self-determination by the end of the preclinical years. Furthermore, analysis of the reflections of clinical students indicated ongoing development of SDL skills throughout their medical school training that were influenced by a wide range of experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.