ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Comparative assessment of myocardial function between late premature newborns and term neonates using the 2D speckle tracking method.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac adaptations to patent ductus arteriosus ligation in preterm infants: a speckle-tracking study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Early targeted neonatal echocardiography identifies biventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension associated with death or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants born before 29 weeks' gestation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Patterns of Segmental Strain of the Left Ventricle in Extremely Premature Infants.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Assessment of myocardial function through speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) can bring benefits to conventional echocardiography in premature newborns, a particular vulnerable group in terms of adaptation to extra-uterine life. Furthermore, it represents a non-invasive imagistic method which can guide therapeutic approach in the hemodynamically unstable newborn. This study aims to highlight the particularities of myocardial function in late premature newborns, by conducting a comparison with a group of healthy neonates, by using STE. Methods: Conducted over a timespan of two years, this prospective study enrolled 64 term neonates and 21 premature newborns, with gestational ages ranging between 28 and 36 weeks, who prior to discharge underwent a cardiac ultrasound, involving two-dimensional image acquisitions of the apical four-chamber view of both ventricles. Afterwards, the images were offline analyzed, by using the autostrain function. Results: After segmental strain analysis, no significant discrepancies between the two groups in terms of interventricular values were found. However, left ventricle and right ventricle strain measurements differed significantly ( Conclusions: The 2D STE is a reliable method for cardiac assessment of late preterm newborns. The evaluation of two-dimensional global longitudinal LV and RV strains might represent a useful tool in clinical practice. A better response of the right ventricle to the longitudinal deformation within premature neonates was noted. Thus, this study facilitates the identification of accurate reference values for this particular population segment, which will enable the evaluation of ventricular function in premature newborns with concurring disorders. Future longitudinal studies, assessing the fetal heart, could provide more insight into the development of myocardial function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.