Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550605›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Preliminary results of hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer in Chandigarh, India: single-centre, non-inferiority, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Budhi Singh Yadav, Divya Dahiya, Manish Gupta, Ankita Gupta, Arun S Oinam, Siddhant Khare, Santhosh Irrinki, Ngangom Robert, Yashwant Raj Sakaray, Satish S Nagaraj and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075058 (A Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Two Adjuvant Hypofractionated Radiation Schedules in Patients With Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075058 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Two Adjuvant Hypofractionated Radiation Schedules in Patients With Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhRan2015 to 2020Enrolled1,070ConditionsBreast CancerArmsHypofractionated Radiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Late cardiac effects in patients with left breast cancer treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Budhi Singh YadavPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Divya DahiyaPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Manish GuptaRegional Cancer Centre, Indira Gandhi Medical College (IGMC), Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Ankita GuptaTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Arun S OinamPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Siddhant KharePost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Santhosh IrrinkiPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Ngangom RobertPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Yashwant Raj SakarayPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Satish S NagarajPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Reena KumariPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INIndira Gandhi Medical College · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Globally, most of the randomised trials with hypofractionation in patients with breast cancer have used 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT). As facilities for 3D-CRT technique may not be available in low-resource settings, there is a need to see if hypofractionation is feasible and safe with 2-dimensional (2-D) technique. In this study, we compared a 3-week radiation schedule with a 2-week schedule of hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer with 2-D technique. Methods: The current study was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Patients with breast cancer, stage I-III, post mastectomy or after breast conservative surgery who needed adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy were randomised in the Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India; to 34Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks (2-week arm) or 35Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks to the chest wall and 40Gy/15#/3wks to breast and supraclavicular fossa (3-week arm). Boost dose when indicated was 8-10Gy/2-4#/2-4 days in both the arms. Patients were planned on a 2-dimensional (2D) simulator with 2 tangential fields to breast/chest wall and incident supraclavicular fossa field. Acute toxicity was assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading scale. Assessments were carried out weekly during radiotherapy and at 4 weeks after treatment by the physician. Cosmetic outcome was assessed using the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/RTOG scale. The toxicity rates between the two arms were compared using Fisher's exact tests. The trial was approved by institutional ethics committee and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04075058. Findings: This study included 1121 eligible patients from June 2015 to December 2020. Median follow-up was 35 months (6-84 months). Mean age was 48 years (24-75 years). The patient characteristics were comparable between the two arms except for more mastectomies in the 3-week arm and more node-positive patients in the 2-week arm. There were more oestrogen receptor-positive tumors in the 3-week arm. Acute skin toxicities were comparable between the two arms. Grade 2 and 3 skin toxicity was 100 (18%) and 82 (15%); and 16 (3%) and 12 (2%) in the 3-week and 2-week arm (p = 0.21), respectively. Cosmetic outcome was assessed as Excellent or Good for 89% of patients in the 3-week arm as compared to 94% in the 2-week arm (p = 0.004). Interpretation: The two radiation schedules were comparable in terms of acute skin toxicity. The cosmetic outcome was better with the 2-week schedule. The preliminary findings indicate 2-week radiotherapy schedule with 2-D technique was better than the 3-week schedule in patients with breast cancer. However, disease outcomes and late-term toxicities need to be further checked. Funding: This study was funded by Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India.

Indexed as

Acute toxicityBreast cancerCosmesisHypofractionationRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38550605
PMCPMC10973130
OpenAlexW4393042321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.