Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550569›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants.

Irina Wils, Alexander Geerardyn, Tristan Putzeys, Guy Fierens, Kathleen Denis, Nicolas Verhaert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irina WilsDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Alexander GeerardynDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tristan PutzeysDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Guy FierensDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kathleen DenisBiomechanics Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nicolas VerhaertDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study evaluates the accuracy of predicting intracochlear pressure during bone conduction stimulation using promontory velocity and ear canal pressure, as less invasive alternatives to intracochlear pressure. Stimulating with a percutaneous bone conduction device implanted in six human cadaveric ears, measurements were taken across various intensities, frequencies, and stimulation positions. Results indicate that intracochlear pressure linearly correlates with ear canal pressure (

Indexed as

bone conductionear canal pressureintracochlear pressureobjective measurespromontory velocity

Identifiers

PMID38550569
PMCPMC10972895
OpenAlexW4392814728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.