Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550568›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Emotion recognition based on microstate analysis from temporal and spatial patterns of electroencephalogram.

Zhen Wei, Hongwei Li, Lin Ma, Haifeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhen WeiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Hongwei LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Lin MaSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.
Haifeng LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, the microstate analysis method has been widely used to investigate the temporal and spatial dynamics of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, most studies have focused on EEG at resting state, and few use microstate analysis to study emotional EEG. This paper aims to investigate the temporal and spatial patterns of EEG in emotional states, and the specific neurophysiological significance of microstates during the emotion cognitive process, and further explore the feasibility and effectiveness of applying the microstate analysis to emotion recognition. Methods: We proposed a KLGEV-criterion-based microstate analysis method, which can automatically and adaptively identify the optimal number of microstates in emotional EEG. The extracted temporal and spatial microstate features then served as novel feature sets to improve the performance of EEG emotion recognition. We evaluated the proposed method on two publicly available emotional EEG datasets: the SJTU Emotion EEG Dataset (SEED) and the Database for Emotion Analysis using Physiological Signals (DEAP). Results: For the SEED dataset, 10 microstates were identified using the proposed method. These temporal and spatial features were fed into AutoGluon, an open-source automatic machine learning model, yielding an average three-class accuracy of 70.38% (±8.03%) in subject-dependent emotion recognition. For the DEAP dataset, the method identified 9 microstates. The average accuracy in the arousal dimension was 74.33% (±5.17%) and 75.49% (±5.70%) in the valence dimension, which were competitive performance compared to some previous machine-learning-based studies. Based on these results, we further discussed the neurophysiological relationship between specific microstates and emotions, which broaden our knowledge of the interpretability of EEG microstates. In particular, we found that arousal ratings were positively correlated with the activity of microstate C (anterior regions of default mode network) and negatively correlated with the activity of microstate D (dorsal attention network), while valence ratings were positively correlated with the activity of microstate B (visual network) and negatively correlated with the activity of microstate D (dorsal attention network). Discussion: In summary, the findings in this paper indicate that the proposed KLGEV-criterion-based method can be employed to research emotional EEG signals effectively, and the microstate features are promising feature sets for EEG-based emotion recognition.

Indexed as

affective computingelectroencephalogramemotion recognitionevoked emotionsmicrostate analysis

Identifiers

PMID38550568
PMCPMC10972890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.