Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550480›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Industry Payments to Orthopedic Surgeons Among All Subspecialties: An Analysis of the Open Payments Database From 2014 to 2019.

John M Tarazi, Nicholas Frane, Alain E Sherman, Peter B White, Matthew Partan, Emma K Humphrey, Adam Bitterman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

John M TaraziDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, USA.
Nicholas FraneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Center for Orthopedic Research and Education (CORE) Institute, Phoenix, USA.
Alain E ShermanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, USA.
Peter B WhiteDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, USA.
Matthew PartanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, USA.
Emma K HumphreyDepartment of Orthopedics, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine-Cleveland, Warrensville Heights, USA.
Adam BittermanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, USA.
Lenox Hill Hospital · USOhio University · USDonald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell · USHeritage College · CAThe Core Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Since the passage of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act in 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) started the National Physician Payment Transparency Program and Open Payments Database (OPD), which allowed for public access to financial disclosures between physicians and industry. Although orthopedic surgeons receive the highest average payments when compared to other specialties, there has been limited data evaluating these payments among the different orthopedic subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to analyze all industry payments made across all subspecialties among orthopedic surgeons. Methods A retrospective review of the CMS OPD was performed to identify all industry payments made by drug and medical device companies to orthopedic surgeons (N = 28,475) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the number, individual value, and total value of industry payments, stratified by payment type and orthopedic subspecialty. Results A total of 1,048,573 payments (approximately $1.6 billion) were made to orthopedic surgeons between 2014 and 2019. The average orthopedic surgeon received 6.14 payments per year (SD = 29.39), with a mean individual payment amount of $1,542.32. Royalties or licensing comprised the greatest proportion of open payments, followed by consulting fees. Adult reconstruction (M = $225,131.10) and spine (M = $197,404.74) received significantly greater total payments when compared to all other subspecialties (all p-values ≤ 0.001). Differences in total payments made to trauma (M = $73,789.65), sports medicine (M = $60,988.09), foot and ankle (M = $45,007.45), pediatric orthopaedics (M = $35,898.54), general orthopaedics (M = $28,405.81), and hand (M = $14,027.76) were all found to be statistically equivalent (all p--values > 0.20). Discussion Increased collaboration between physicians and industry has resulted in the rapid advancement of innovation that can have sizeable financial implications among orthopedic surgeons. There exists significant heterogeneity in open payments made to orthopedic surgeons when stratified by subspecialty. Adult reconstructive and spine surgeons were the most compensated whereas hand and general orthopaedic surgeons received the least.

Indexed as

centers for medicare and medicaid servicesindustry paymentopen payments databaseorthopedic surgerypayments from industry

Identifiers

PMID38550480
PMCPMC10972700
OpenAlexW4392167551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.