ArticleCureus2024
Twists and Turns: A Chiropractic Roller Coaster Experience Unraveling the Intricacies of Bilateral Vertebral Artery Dissection.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary insult in vertebral artery dissections (VADs) involves a tear in the vertebral artery intima, resulting in potential thrombus formation and an elevated risk of cerebrovascular events, such as stroke. Despite its relatively low overall incidence rate, VADs contribute to a significant proportion of ischemic strokes within the younger population. VAD has been associated with various risk factors including but not limited to neck trauma from chiropractic manipulation and significant neck movements. Our patient initially presented with a worsening occipital headache but was discharged due to the absence of any red-flag symptoms. However, the patient shortly returned to the ED upon worsening symptoms, and despite the lack of apparent neurological deficits, the patient's history of cervical spine manipulation and exposure to neck trauma risk activities (roller coaster riding) increased suspicion for VAD. This case highlights the importance of considering VAD as a differential diagnosis in young patients presenting with unexplained headaches and neck pain following events that exert stress on the vertebral arteries, such as roller coaster rides and chiropractic neck manipulation. When managed properly, the long-term prognosis of VAD is generally favorable; however, the risk of recurrent dissection and stroke still remains. Thus, this case further emphasizes the need for timely intervention and the role of dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) in the management of VAD to prevent further complications such as stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.