ArticleCureus2024
Clinical Profiles and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in a Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Gallstone Treatment Methods, State of the Art.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a lifesaving therapeutic procedure that carries its own complexities and risks. Clinicians use ERCP as a therapeutic tool for the treatment of biliary stones, malignant obstruction, and acute cholangitis. Aim In our study, we aimed to analyze the clinical profile and outcome of patients who underwent ERCP in the Department of Medical Gastroenterology from August 2021 to February 2023 at Government Medical College Kottayam in India. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study using data from patients who underwent ERCP in the Department of Medical Gastroenterology from August 2021 to February 2023 at Government Medical College Kottayam. We used a semi-structured questionnaire, pro forma, laboratory investigation reports, and SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) for our data analysis. We included all patients older than 18 years. Results In our study 65% of the patients were female. The primary indication for ERCP was common bile duct stones. Of the 216 attempted ERCP cases, we performed successful cannulation in 201 patients, a success rate of 93%. The cannulation time was less than five minutes in the majority of the cases and more than five minutes in 30% of the cases. The commonest type of ampulla in our study was Type One. In our study patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had an increased risk of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis. The most common complication in our study was pancreatitis, which occurred in 29 cases (14%). Only three cases had moderate to severe pancreatitis requiring a prolonged hospital stay of more than three days. There was one fatality immediately following ERCP probably owing to sepsis-induced myocarditis. Of the 201 cases, 15 (7.5%) required precut sphincterotomy. Conclusion Analysis of data from patients who underwent ERCP in our department showed that the procedure is safe and effective in treating biliary disorders. The successful cannulation rate and complication rate with ERCP in our tertiary care center are at par with other published data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.