ArticleCureus2024
Spirometric Assessment of Pulmonary Function Tests in Asthma Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic susceptibility to respiratory health effects from outdoor air pollution: a structured narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAsthma is a chronic airway inflammatory disorder that imposes substantial morbidity and mortality. Spirometry is a significant tool for the objective measurement of obstruction among asthmatics. The present study was conducted to assess the pulmonary function test parameters among asthmatics and compare the observed and predicted values. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional research was performed on 120 asthmatic patients who attended a tertiary care healthcare center and underwent spirometry evaluation. The spirometry indices such as forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) were recorded. Further, a gender-wise comparison of spirometry indices was also done.
resultsThere was a substantial decrease in FVC (2.05 ± 0.12 vs. 2.75 ± 0.24 L/sec; p = 0.02), FEV1 (1.78 ± 0.16 vs. 2.38 ± 0.32 L/sec; p = 0.01), FEV1/FVC ratio (74 ± 4.38 vs. 83 ± 5.76 %; p = 0.01), PEFR (4.76 ± 0.42 vs. 5.82 ± 0.65 L/sec; p = 0.03), and MVV (78.65 ± 28.45 vs. 115.87 ± 32.15 L/min; p = 0.001) for observed and predicted values. Female asthmatic patients displayed a substantial decline in FVC (p = 0.001), FEV1 (p = 0.006), FEV1/FVC (p = 0.001), and MVV (p = 0.01) when compared to males.
conclusionThis study suggests that asthmatic individuals had impaired lung function upon initial assessment. Female asthmatic patients studied are at increased risk of asthma severity when compared to males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.