ArticleCureus2024
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a Patient With Cardiogenic Shock: To Revascularize or Not to Revascularize?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed cardiogenic shock following spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a young, healthy female: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Thrombolysis in spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report of acute catastrophic dissection requiring coronary artery bypass surgery and delayed heart transplant in a young woman with fibromuscular dysplasia.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome in young patients. Supportive care is recommended for most uncomplicated cases. However, it is unclear if revascularization plays a role in treating SCAD, particularly in the setting of cardiogenic shock. We present a case of a 40-year-old female with no past medical history admitted for SCAD that was complicated by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) stage D cardiogenic shock. She was successfully managed with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device without revascularization. Repeat angiogram showed healed left anterior descending (LAD) SCAD with recovery of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. This case highlights the importance of supportive care in the treatment of SCAD, as revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) can pose a significant perioperative risk in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.