ArticleCureus2024
A Case Report on Endometrial Receptivity Array Test for Infertile Patient to Enhance Reproductive Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The issue of infertility affects couples all over the world. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is caused by immunology, thrombophilias, endometrial receptivity, microbiota, anatomical anomalies, male factors, and embryo aneuploidy. An accurate evaluation of endometrial receptivity (ER) in cases of RIF during in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments is crucial to improve reproductive outcomes. To find her accurate window of implantation (WOI), a 34-year-old woman with unexplained RIF underwent an endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test. This case study examines her inexplicable RIF and reproductive results. The ERA test examined gene expression patterns in endometrial tissue to determine the receptive phase for proper embryo transfer. Primary infertility, ineffective intrauterine insemination (IUI), and several unsuccessful IVF rounds were all part of the patient's medical history. Her WOI determined the embryo transfer timing after getting the ERA test results. The patient's clinical pregnancy was successful. This particular case focuses on the potential of the ERA test to improve reproductive outcomes. However, when using this strategy, it is essential to consider difficulties, including invasiveness and related expenses. In this case, the positive results urge future research to apply customized WOI determination using the ERA test to improve the effectiveness of IVF therapies in patients with recurrent implantation failure. More extensive investigations and controlled trials are required to confirm these results and the broader applicability of this strategy. The ERA test is promising, but to provide a holistic approach to infertility care, it should be taken into account together with endometrial changes and elements of embryo-endometrial interaction that impact the success of implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.