ReviewCureus2024
Myocardial Injury as a Harbinger of Multi-organ Failure in Septic Shock: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploration and prospect of core research hotspots in sepsis-induced myocardial injury based on bibliometrics.Medicine · 2026Article
- Septic Cardiac Remodeling: A New Concept in Cardiac Dysfunction Induced by Experimental Sepsis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ursodeoxycholic Acid Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Myocardial Injury by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Apoptosis: The Interplay of Sirt1/Nrf2 and Akt/NF-κB Signaling Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- From cardiac injury to omics signatures: a narrative review on biomarkers in septic cardiomyopathy.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial injury in the context of septic shock presents a multifaceted challenge in critical care medicine with implications for patient prognosis and therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review explores the mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and clinical implications of myocardial injury as a harbinger of multi-organ failure in septic shock. We delineate the pathophysiological processes underlying myocardial injury, including inflammation, oxidative stress, and microcirculatory dysfunction, and discuss the diagnostic utility of cardiac biomarkers and imaging modalities in identifying myocardial injury. Furthermore, we elucidate the prognostic significance of myocardial injury and its implications for patient management, highlighting the need for tailored therapeutic interventions to mitigate its adverse effects. Future research and clinical practice directions are also discussed, emphasizing the importance of personalized medicine approaches and multidisciplinary collaboration in optimizing outcomes for patients with septic shock-associated myocardial injury. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of myocardial injury in septic shock and inform strategies for improving patient care in this challenging clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.