ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024
Individual benefit in heart sparing during DIBH-supported left breast radiotherapy.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment planning comparison of proton arc therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy for synchronous bilateral breast or chest wall and regional nodal irradiation.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Androgen receptor-positive, locoregionally advanced breast cancer in a transgender man and an update on breast cancer management in a gender-diverse patient population.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Predictors of acute upper GI toxicity and its correlation with dosimetric analysis in patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deep-inspirational breath hold (DIBH) is an option for heart protection in breast radiotherapy; we intended to study its individual benefit. Materials and Methods: 3DCRT treatment planning was performed in a cohort of 103 patients receiving radiotherapy of the whole breast (WBI)/chest wall (CWI) ± nodal regions (NI) both under DIBH and free breathing (FB) in the supine position, and in the WBI only cases prone (n = 45) position, too. A series of patient-related and heart dosimetry parameters were analyzed. Results: The DIBH technique provided dramatic reduction of all heart dosimetry parameters the individual benefit, however, varied. In the whole population the best predictor of benefit was the ratio of ipsilateral lung volume (ILV)FB and ILVDIBH. In the WBI cohort 9-11 patients and 5-8 patients received less dose to selected heart structures with the DIBH and prone positioning, respectively; based on meeting various dose constraints DIBH was the only solution in 6-13 cases, and prone positioning in 5-6 cases. In addition to other excellent predictors, a small ILVFB or ILVDIBH with outstanding predicting performance (AUC ≥ 0.90) suggested prone positioning. Detailed analysis consistently indicated the outstanding performance of ILVFB and ILVDIBH in predicting the benefit of one over the other technique in lowering the mean heart dose (MHD), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) mean dose and left ventricle(LV)-V5Gy. The preference of prone positioning was further confirmed by anatomical parameters measured on a single CT scan at the middle of the heart. Performing spirometry in a cohort of 12 patients, vital capacity showed the strongest correlation with ILVFB and ILVDIBH hence this test could be evaluated as a clinical tool for patient selection. Discussion: Individual lung volume measures estimated by spirometry and anatomical data examined prior to acquiring planning CT may support the preference of DIBH or prone radiotherapy for optimal heart protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.