ArticleBrain communications2024
Predictive value of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of neutrophil-to-apolipoprotein A1 ratio for early postoperative cerebral infarction in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-to-apolipoprotein A1 ratio as a novel biomarker for prognosis in anti-NMDAR encephalitis: a retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio has emerged as a possible prognostic biomarker in different medical conditions. Nonetheless, the predictive potential of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio in determining the 3-month prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke patients who undergo intravenous thrombolysis has yet to be fully acknowledged. In this study, 196 acute ischaemic stroke patients with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and 133 healthy controls were included. Meanwhile, we incorporated a total of 386 non-thrombolytic acute ischaemic stroke patients. The acute ischaemic stroke patients with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were divided into four groups based on quartiles of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio. The association between neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio and the 3-month prognosis was evaluated through univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the predictive value of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio in different patient populations. Adverse outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6. The study findings revealed a significant association between elevated neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio levels and poor prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke patients. In the highest quartile of neutrophil to apolipoprotein A1 ratio levels (Q4), after controlling for age, gender, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, blood urea nitrogen and stroke subtypes, the odds ratio for adverse outcomes at 3 months was 13.314 (95% confidence interval: 2.878-61.596,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.