Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550304›Full record

ArticleJournal of health disparities research and practice2021

A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Pap Testing in Women with Disabilities and Serious Mental Illnesses: Thirty Years After the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Michele Sky Lee, Jillian R Peart, Julie S Armin, Heather J Williamson

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health disparities research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele Sky LeeThe Institute for Human Development, Northern Arizona University.
Jillian R PeartNorthern Arizona University.
Julie S ArminDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona.
Heather J WilliamsonCenter for Health Equity Research and Department of Occupational Therapy, Northern Arizona University.
Northern Arizona University · US

Funding

Training/Career Development and Education Core and PlansU54CA143925 · NCI · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI JANI CHERI INGRAM, Jason A Wilder · 2009 to 2026
$27.5M
Uranium as an Environmental Risk Factor for Cancer Among the NavajoU54CA143924 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Gloria D. Coronado · 2009 to 2026
$26.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143924NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thirty years after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was passed, promising equal access to health services for people with disabilities and serious mental illness, research on Pap testing continues to uncover health disparities among women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses, including those that identify as an ethnic/racial minority. Aim: The purpose of this paper is to describe and present the literature on the barriers and facilitators women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses face with receiving a Pap test using the social ecological model. We also examined the degree to which racial/ethnic minority women were included in these articles. Method: A scoping review was conducted where the research team searched United States academic literature from 1990 through February 2020 in PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL using general subject headings for disability, mental illness, and Pap testing. Results: Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria. More barriers than facilitators were mentioned in articles. Barriers and facilitators are organized into three groups according to social ecological model and include individual (e.g., socioeconomic status, anxiety, education), interpersonal (e.g., family, living environment), and organizational factors (health care provider training, health care system). Participant's race/ethnicity were often reported but minoritized populations were often not the focus of articles. Conclusions: More articles discussed the difficulties that women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses face with receiving a Pap test than facilitators to Pap testing. Additional research should focus on the intersectionality race/ethnicity and women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses in relation to Pap testing.

Indexed as

disabilitymental illnessesPap testingpublic healthWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID38550304
PMCPMC10978025
OpenAlexW3216375691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.