Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38550262›Full record

ArticleDigital health

RTC_TongueNet: An improved tongue image segmentation model based on DeepLabV3.

Yan Tang, Daiqing Tan, Huixia Li, Muhua Zhu, Xiaohui Li, Xuan Wang, JiaQi Wang, Zaijian Wang, Chenxi Gao, Ji Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yan TangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Daiqing TanBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1559-7785
Huixia LiThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Muhua ZhuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaohui LiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xuan WangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
JiaQi WangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zaijian WangThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chenxi GaoBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ji WangNational Institute of TCM Constitution and Prevention Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Aiqing HanBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-0873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Tongue segmentation as a basis for automated tongue recognition studies in Chinese medicine, which has defects such as network degradation and inability to obtain global features, which seriously affects the segmentation effect. This article proposes an improved model RTC_TongueNet based on DeepLabV3, which combines the improved residual structure and transformer and integrates the ECA (Efficient Channel Attention Module) attention mechanism of multiscale atrous convolution to improve the effect of tongue image segmentation. Methods: In this paper, we improve the backbone network based on DeepLabV3 by incorporating the transformer structure and an improved residual structure. The residual module is divided into two structures and uses different residual structures under different conditions to speed up the frequency of shallow information mapping to deep network, which can more effectively extract the underlying features of tongue image; introduces ECA attention mechanism after concat operation in ASPP (Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling) structure to strengthen information interaction and fusion, effectively extract local and global features, and enable the model to focus more on difficult-to-separate areas such as tongue edge, to obtain better segmentation effect. Results: The RTC_TongueNet network model was compared with FCN (Fully Convolutional Networks), UNet, LRASPP (Lite Reduced ASPP), and DeepLabV3 models on two datasets. On the two datasets, the MIOU (Mean Intersection over Union) and MPA (Mean Pixel Accuracy) values of the classic model DeepLabV3 were higher than those of FCN, UNet, and LRASPP models, and the performance was better. Compared with the DeepLabV3 model, the RTC_TongueNet network model increased MIOU value by 0.9% and MPA value by 0.3% on the first dataset; MIOU increased by 1.0% and MPA increased by 1.1% on the second dataset. RTC_TongueNet model performed best on both datasets. Conclusion: In this study, based on DeepLabV3, we apply the improved residual structure and transformer as a backbone to fully extract image features locally and globally. The ECA attention module is combined to enhance channel attention, strengthen useful information, and weaken the interference of useless information. RTC_TongueNet model can effectively segment tongue images. This study has practical application value and reference value for tongue image segmentation.

Indexed as

attention mechanismDeepLabV3improved residual structureTongue segmentationtransformer

Identifiers

PMID38550262
PMCPMC10976494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.