Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549951›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2024

Safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 heterologous prime-boost vaccines in an overweight population in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Kriangkrai Chawansuntati, Supachai Sakkhachornphop, Sayamon Hongjaisee, Saranta Freeouf, Patumrat Sripan, Nattaya Nusartsang, Romanee Chaiwarith, Tavitiya Sudjaritruk, Khuanchai Supparatpinyo, Jiraprapa Wipasa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kriangkrai ChawansuntatiResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Supachai SakkhachornphopResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Sayamon HongjaiseeResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Saranta FreeoufResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Patumrat SripanResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Nattaya NusartsangResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Romanee ChaiwarithDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Tavitiya SudjaritrukDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Khuanchai SupparatpinyoResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Jiraprapa WipasaResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50202, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In early 2021, the Ministry of Public Health of Thailand announced heterologous regimens for COVID-19 vaccines using CoronaVac as the first dose followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 at 3 weeks apart. Priority was given to individuals above 60 years old and those who had seven underlying conditions, including obesity. The vaccine regimen was evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in overweight populations in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Methods: Participants who had a COVID-19 vaccination appointment for the heterologous prime-boost regimen were enrolled. Before each immunization and on day 28 following the second dosage, blood samples were taken, and were examined for anti-spike and neutralizing antibodies by using an indirect ELISA and virus neutralization assays. Safety profile of the vaccine regimen was assessed via a self-recorded diary of adverse events after each vaccination. Results: No serious adverse events related to vaccination were reported during study period and the majority of adverse reactions were fatigue and pain at the injection site. The levels of anti-spike IgG were 26.3, 56.4 and 1752.1 BAU/mL at baseline, 21 days after first dose and 28 days after second dose, respectively. At 4 weeks after complete vaccination, the median inhibition rates of neutralizing antibody determined by surrogate neutralization assay against wild type, Delta and Omicron variants were 95.2, 85.0 and 3.8, respectively. Moreover, the NT50 level against wild type and Delta variants determined by pseudotyped virus neutralization assay were 133.3 and 41.7, respectively. The neutralizing activity against Omicron variant was almost lower than cutoff level for detection. Conclusions: The heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1vaccination was safe, well-tolerated and able to induce humoral immunity against wild-type and Delta variants but not against the Omicron variant in overweight population.

Indexed as

ChAdOx1CoronaVacCoronavirus disease (COVID-19)Neutralizing antibodiesSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Identifiers

PMID38549951
PMCPMC10973674
OpenAlexW4392881921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.