Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38549867›Full record

ArticleJournal of intercultural management and ethics2021

GLOBAL PANDEMICS: CONSIDERATIONS OF PUBLIC HEALTH, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND BIOETHICS.

Sana Loue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intercultural management and ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sana LoueCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

MBARARA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ETHICS EDUCATION PROGRAM (MUREEP)R25TW010507 · FIC · MBARARA UNIVERSITY/SCIENCE/ TECHNOLOGY · PI Francis Bajunirwe, Gertrude Kiwanuka · 2018 to 2026
$1.8M
DRUG DISCOVERY AGAINST CRYPTOSPORIDIUM PARVUMR03TW001507 · FIC · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI KEITHLY, JANET S. · 2001 to 2003
$96k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW001507FIC NIH HHS R25 TW010507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pandemics threaten the health and lives of peoples worldwide, sometimes requiring the imposition of numerous, restrictive public health measures to diminish their impact and preserve health and life. Such measures, however well-intended, have the potential to contravene human rights and raise significant ethical questions at the individual, community, national, and international levels. This article explores the impact of public health measures adopted in an effort to ameliorate the transmission of COVID-19 on access to care, the right to privacy, protection of marginalized communities from discrimination, and violence against women. The discussion of bioethical concerns focuses on resource allocation, the presumed obligation of healthcare workers to provide care, and governmental obligations in the face of a pandemic. The discussion concludes with a review of lessons learned: the need for a coordinated response across levels of government and the private sector, attention to existing structural inequalities that may exacerbate the impact of the pandemic and/or the public health measures adopted to contain the pandemic, the protection of vulnerable and marginalized persons, a clear delineation of and support for workers deemed to be essential, and the provision of relevant training to law enforcement personnel.

Indexed as

bioethicshuman rightspandemicprivacypublic healthvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID38549867
PMCPMC10976441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.