ArticleAllergologie select2024
Individual wearable air purifier protects against pollen, house dust mite, and cat allergens: Report from an allergen exposure chamber.
Article in Allergologie select, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bispecific nanobodies targeting Bet v 1 and ICAM-1 decrease respiratory epithelial penetration of Bet v 1.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A Modern Approach to Clinical Outcome Assessment in Allergy Management: Advantages of Allergen Exposure Chambers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Air pollution and rhinitis.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvaluation of a new individual wearable air purifier (Respiray Wear A+) for birch pollen, house dust mite (HDM), and cat-allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) patients in a standardized allergen exposure chamber (AEC). MATERIALS AND
methodsEligible allergic patients were exposed to birch pollen, HDM raw material, and cat allergen in an AEC for 60 minutes without (V1) and with (V3) the use of the Respiray device. Nasal, ocular, bronchial, and other symptoms were rated by the patients every 10 minutes, and their wellbeing, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and lung function parameters were assessed every 30 minutes. The primary endpoint was the change in the median of the total symptom score (TSS) at V3 compared to V1 at 60 minutes of exposure. The secondary endpoints consisted of the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and total eye symptom score (TESS).
results23 patients with birch pollen allergy, 37 patients with HDM allergy, and 41 patients with cat allergy were included in the analysis. Significant reduced symptom scores of ~ 49% were observed when using Respiray Wea A+ under birch pollen exposure (p < 0.05) in the primary endpoint TSS (V3 2.43 compared to V1 4.78). An 48% reduction of symptoms was seen in TSS in case of HDM exposure (V3 3.59; V1 6.92, (t-test: p < 0.01)) and the highest reduction of TSS (60%) under Respiray A+ using cat allergens (V3 2.95, V1 7.44, (t-test p < 0.01) after 60 minutes of exposure. The personal wellbeing revealed clinically meaningful improvements over time in all three studies which manifested in a lower symptom increase during the final allergen exposures.
conclusionThe individual wearable air purifier Respiray Wear A+ protects significantly against airborne pollen, HDM, and cat allergens and may be a very useful device for avoiding indoor allergens in a new way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.