ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports2024
ChatGPT as a Diagnostic Aid in Alzheimer's Disease: An Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-driven natural language processing for identifying linguistic patterns in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A study of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features of speech through picture description tasks.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Use of artificial intelligence chatbots in clinical management of immune-related adverse events.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Article
- ChatGPT's Inconsistency in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The potential of ChatGPT in medical diagnosis has been explored in various medical conditions. Objective: We assessed whether ChatGPT can contribute to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: We provided ChatGPT with four generated cases (mild, moderate, or advanced stage AD dementia, or mild cognitive impairment), including descriptions of their complaints, physical examinations, as well as biomarker, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological data. Results: ChatGPT accurately diagnosed the test cases similarly to two blinded specialists. Conclusions: While the use of generated cases can be a limitation to our study, our findings demonstrate that ChatGPT can be a useful tool for symptom assessment and the diagnosis of AD. However, while the use of ChatGPT in AD diagnosis is promising, it should be seen as an adjunct to clinical judgment rather than a replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.