ArticleRadiation oncology journal2024
Radiomics in stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and radiomic quality score study.
Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mastering CT-based radiomic research in lung cancer: a practical guide from study design to critical appraisal.The British journal of radiology · 2025Guideline
- Integrating peritumor and tumor CT radiomics features in predicting local control after SBRT in patients with pulmonary oligometastases.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been widely utilized for curative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has achieved good local control rate comparable to surgery. Currently, no standard risk model exists for SBRT outcome or complication prediction. Radiomics has the potential to improve clinical outcome prognostication. Here, we reviewed the current literature on the radiomic analyses of thoracic SBRT through the use of radiomic quality score (RQS). MATERIALS AND
methodsLiterature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase to retrieve radiomics studies on SBRT for early NSCLC. The literature search included studies up to June 2021. Only full papers published in peer reviewed journals were included. Studies that included metastatic lung cancers or non-lung cancers were excluded. Two independent investigators evaluated each study using the RQS and resolved discrepancies through discussion.
resultsA total number of 25 studies were analysed. The mean RQS was 7.76 of a maximum score of 36. This corresponds to 21.56% of the maximum score. Lack of feature reduction strategies, external validation and open data sharing were identified as key limitations of the reviewed studies. Meanwhile, various common radiomic signatures across different studies such as gray level co-occurrence matrix Homogeneity and energy have been identified. Multiple robust radiomic models have also been reviewed that may improve outcome or complication prediction.
conclusionRadiomics in thoracic SBRT has a very promising future as a prognostication tool. However, larger multicenter prospective studies are required to confirm radiomic signatures. Improvement in future study methodologies can also facilitate its wider application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.